Bushmills 16 y.o. Review

Bushmills 16 y.o.099

40% abv

Score:  88.5/100


Ahhh…young love.  Sixteen year old bourbon-casked whisky meets sixteen year old sherry-casked whisky.  The two go for a quick roll in a port-infused cask and what we end up with is a sweet, sweet thing.

Surprisingly, something in this one rings incredibly close to exotic depths of fruit.  Not something I’d expect in a dram this young, but I am certainly not complaining.

Nose:  Playdough.  Chewy sugar cookies.  Deep grape notes.  Orange peelings.  Cinnamon and nutmeg.  Dust.  Like a glass of fruit juice.  Mulled cider and maybe a little Amaretto.  At once clean and…not.  In a good way.

Palate:  Black current.  A hint of smoke.  Big purple grape.  Five Alive (for the spectacularly rich fruit mix).  Some mouth-puckering tannins.

Smooth…until the slightly bitter finsh.  Slightly contrived, but exceptionally enticing and enjoyable.  Love this one.


– Reviewed by:  Curt

– Photo:  Curt

4 thoughts on “Bushmills 16 y.o. Review

  1. Jeff

    I’ve never been in love with port finishes anyway because of the bitterness and the stiff punch, so I found this one a little challenging. I recently tried the Balvenie 21 Port Wood and liked it better overall, but it’s still not my favourite profile.

    1. Robert

      I haven’t tried the Balvenie, but do enjoy the Bushmills 16. Not an every day dram, but a pleasant change on occasion, The port finish I don’t like is the Quinta Jeff, I seem to remember you were going to open a Bowmore 18? What did you think?

      1. Jeff

        Hi Robert! I did try the Bowmore 18, from the 12/15/18 mini three-pack. I find whiskies generally more difficult to judge from minis because I think they oxidize differently and/or not as well. In any case, the 18 is an excellent, round, mature scotch. The nose is complex, with a number of toffee/sweet notes, combined with traditional peat/sherry/oak (American and French), and even offset by some petroleum and fruit. The palate’s dominated by dark chocolate with a bitter peat twist. The age really shows in the finish, however, with a huge, long fade curve – one of the few whiskies in which I think the finish steals the show. Very well balanced, with great depth for modest power (much like Highland Park 18), I think this should be waited out (consumed over the course of an hour) after giving it lots of time to settle in a capped glass.

        A 91/100 for both myself and my buddy, the Scotch Guru, and the mini did its job – I’ll buy a big one when a Bowmore slot opens up in the roster, but I’ve got a new Darkest to get through first.


        1. Robert

          I agree with your assessment.
          The nose and finish are really pleasant with peat and dark fruit, but the palate
          is less so. I kept wanting to go back for an occassional treat, though, especially as it improved with oxidation. It’s a bit high priced, so I haven’t replaced
          it yet. Would be great to get as a gift! (Hint to relatives!).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s